How do feminist movements addressing sexual and gender-based violence sustain themselves over time? Drawing on feminist interpretive methods and fieldwork with activists across India, I show how the visibility of certain cases — and the legal reforms they drive — can obscure the slower, quieter labor that keeps movements alive.

I develop a hierarchy of victimhood to explain whose suffering is recognized by media, law, and the state, and whose is not. Against that, I center the care practices — rest, refusal, collective support, and repair — through which activists endure work that is urgent, exhausting, and rarely sustainable on its own terms.

Key contributions
Hierarchy of victimhood
Which victims are seen, and which are not.
Spectacularity & the limits of legal reform
High-profile cases drive law — but not sustained change.
Activist care practices
How movements sustain the people who sustain them.
Related Publications

Work from this project.

View related publications →